Explanation of Hannah’s CogAT Report
Explanation of Hannah’s CogAT Report
This report is from the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT), a widely used assessment in U.S. schools to measure students’ verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal reasoning abilities. These skills are closely related to academic success and are often used for identifying students for gifted and advanced programs.
⭐ What This Test Measures
CogAT evaluates three major cognitive areas:
- Verbal Reasoning – language understanding, verbal analogy, comprehension
- Quantitative Reasoning – numerical patterns, mathematical logic
- Nonverbal Reasoning – spatial reasoning and visual problem-solving
This is not an academic knowledge test. It measures a student’s thinking abilities.
📊 Hannah’s Overall Performance (Very Strong)
Her Composite (overall) Standard Age Score is 128,
which places her in the 96th percentile nationwide.
→ This means she performed better than 96% of students her age, placing her in the Above Average to High Abilityrange.
🔍 Breakdown of Hannah’s Scores


1. Verbal Reasoning
- SAS: 109
- Stanine: 5
- Percentile: 57%
This is her relative area of weakness compared to her other scores.
It may affect:
- reading comprehension
- writing fluency and organization
- vocabulary development
The report recommends targeted instruction and more reading/language practice.
2. Quantitative Reasoning (Math Ability)
- SAS: 133
- Percentile: 98%
Hannah is exceptionally strong in math reasoning, placing in the top 2% of students nationwide.
This indicates high natural ability in:
- numerical pattern recognition
- logical analysis
- mathematical concepts
3. Nonverbal Reasoning (Spatial / Visual Logic)
- SAS: 132
- Percentile: 98%
This score is also in the top 2%.
It reflects exceptional talent in:
- spatial visualization
- graphic and visual reasoning
- design, art, and STEM-related spatial processing
This aligns very well with her artistic abilities.
📘 What the Report Suggests
1. Hannah’s overall ability is very strong.
Her Quantitative and Nonverbal scores are at a gifted level.
2. Her Verbal score is significantly lower than the other two areas.
Not low, but relatively weaker.
The school recommends:
- using her stronger areas to support verbal growth
- individualized instruction
- increasing reading and language-based practice
3. Improving reading comprehension will help strengthen her verbal reasoning.
This also explains why she struggles with writing assignments and feels pressure in Language Arts—it is consistent with her cognitive profile.
🎯 What This Means for Hannah
1. She is a high-ability student with gifted-level strengths in math and spatial reasoning.
Her performance is exceptional in two of the three categories.
2. Her verbal weakness is relative, not an indication of low ability.
For bilingual or multilingual children, lower verbal CogAT scores are very common.
3. This report supports her eligibility for advanced or gifted programs, especially in STEM-related areas.
4. It provides a clear direction for supporting her academically:
Continue nurturing her strengths while giving structured support in reading, vocabulary, and writing.
🧩 In one sentence:
Hannah is a high-ability student with exceptional strengths in math and spatial reasoning (top 2%), and a relative weakness in verbal reasoning that can improve with targeted reading and language support.
Leave a comment